<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links: China Microblogging, Hong Kong 2.0, Abang learnings, QQ, and more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cnreviews.com/china_blogosphere/links_china_microblogging_hong_kong_20_abang_learnings_qq_and_more__20080127.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cnreviews.com/china_blogosphere/links_china_microblogging_hong_kong_20_abang_learnings_qq_and_more__20080127.html</link>
	<description>About China blogosphere, travel, and entrepreneurship</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://cnreviews.com/china_blogosphere/links_china_microblogging_hong_kong_20_abang_learnings_qq_and_more__20080127.html#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnreviews.com/china_blogosphere/links_china_microblogging_hong_kong_20_abang_learnings_qq_and_more__20080127.html#comment-104</guid>
		<description>1. I can't really say I follow or even agree with David Feng's short pseudo-analysis of linguistics when it comes to "bei guan zhu." To a certain extent, there definitely are cultural differences towards the concept of "individualism within society" but I don't really see a case being made by David there with respect to Twitter-esque services or not.

2. Did you say "homeboys?" Oh my god, "peeps?" I'll never see you quite the same way again, Elliot.

3. I posted a response to Thomas Crampton's About.com article &lt;a href="http://www.tripdingo.com/2008/01/28/5-aboutcom-insights-about-chinese-internet-users/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I can&#8217;t really say I follow or even agree with David Feng&#8217;s short pseudo-analysis of linguistics when it comes to &#8220;bei guan zhu.&#8221; To a certain extent, there definitely are cultural differences towards the concept of &#8220;individualism within society&#8221; but I don&#8217;t really see a case being made by David there with respect to Twitter-esque services or not.</p>
<p>2. Did you say &#8220;homeboys?&#8221; Oh my god, &#8220;peeps?&#8221; I&#8217;ll never see you quite the same way again, Elliot.</p>
<p>3. I posted a response to Thomas Crampton&#8217;s About.com article <a href="http://www.tripdingo.com/2008/01/28/5-aboutcom-insights-about-chinese-internet-users/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.tripdingo.com');">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TripDingo</title>
		<link>http://cnreviews.com/china_blogosphere/links_china_microblogging_hong_kong_20_abang_learnings_qq_and_more__20080127.html#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>TripDingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnreviews.com/china_blogosphere/links_china_microblogging_hong_kong_20_abang_learnings_qq_and_more__20080127.html#comment-103</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;5 About.com Insights about Chinese Internet Users?...&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#8217;ll be honest, it is far easier being a critic than an advocate. It is easier to rip apart something than to build something up. It is easier destroying than creating.
In science, we call it &#8220;peer-review.&#8221;
And it&#8217;s a good conce...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>5 About.com Insights about Chinese Internet Users?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest, it is far easier being a critic than an advocate. It is easier to rip apart something than to build something up. It is easier destroying than creating.<br />
In science, we call it &#8220;peer-review.&#8221;<br />
And it&#8217;s a good conce&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
